• Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size
Home Blog
Print

Different facets of China

 

China Daily reported on July 31 that China had just overtaken Japan as the world second largest economy. Yet her per-capita income grows modestly to US$3,800 which is miserably small compared to US ($46,730) and Japan ($33,280). It is interesting to see a communist state which was a less developed country just thirty years ago has achieved the formidable status in such short time.

Her economic performance has baffled many economists, academics and politicians inside and outside China. Standard economic theories do not explain China model adequately. Many economists have predicted that her property bubble is going to burst with humongous damage the world has never seen. Yet she is still able to hang on to the property growth. Not so long ago there was still wide media coverage on the infamous poor quality in food, products and services. But now, some well developed countries are setting up tariffs to block some Chinese imports to protect their own industries.

Conflicting theories and hypothesis have been published to depict the China model on her success and failure. All seems to be true. Why is it so? I like to use the analogy of seven blind men touching different parts of an elephant and each claiming they know what an elephant is like. Yes China is so huge and diversified that you cannot find another country similar to her state of affairs.

The fundamental of her administration is a socialist system managing a capitalistic economy. She does not adopt all the western economic practices. The practices and theories are selected and customized to her needs. Even the communism which Mao Zedong preached was different from Russia.

Her exploded economic development with the high rise buildings, higher standard of living and the expensive cars on the road have led us to believe the capitalism is at work. The Chinese are very capitalistic indeed but not the administration which is a unique socialism that China has evolved it into. You do not find the local financial institutions behaving like their peers on the Wall Street across the ocean. Also when the state owned corporation chiefs want to overly compensate themselves, you will find a directive from the central government to curb the remuneration and bonus for these chiefs. The chiefs have to quietly adhere to the directive. President Obama has to fight acrimoniously in the Capitol Hill and with the media to push his course. Thus using the western yardstick to comment China is stepping on the wrong foot.

You cannot use Japan property bubble burst or even the recent Dubai case to explain China property phenomenon. You can use it if China is only Shanghai. Though the property price in some major cities is outrageously high beyond one imagine, China has so many other cities to lessen the impact. There are four forces in play and each trying to control the property development. Firstly the central government wants to curb the price increase so as to allow the low income group to own a home. The local governments rely on the sale of land for their revenue; while the property developers want to manipulate the market for their profit. And lastly the home buyers want to speculate to make hefty profit too by borrowing from a pool of relatives and friends. The collaboration between local governments and property developers against the central government will put up a spectacular show of who is mightier. The home buyers will determine the tip of the balance. That is, if more home buyers believe the price will keep escalating and flock to the sales office, the central government will introduce more drastic legislation to cool the market. The Chinese government needs to find alternate investment vehicles for her rich citizen in order to alleviate the heat on property speculation.

The major coastal cities are well developed with the standard of living comparable to developed countries. The western and some central regions are less developed and offer the same kind of opportunities and environment the coastal cities have provided two decades ago. Thus there is still ample growth opportunity for China. Many companies have moved inland to avoid the higher operating cost at the coastal cities. China has a combination of high tech industries and low cost manufacturing base. It is too early to foretell that many manufacturing companies will leave China for cheaper place elsewhere. Many companies had indeed left for India and Vietnam but also some of them had quietly returned to China too as there is no other place like China that could offer cost competitive environment plus a huge growing market. And also the competent and hard working workers at comparative low cost are another strategic leverage China has.

As for the Chinese, they are too large to be generalized. With 1.3 billion people, you can always find both extremes from the malevolence to most humble people on the street. There are many “Forrest Gump” everywhere complementary the unscrupulous people preying on the innocents. Many younger Chinese have adopted the western beliefs and way of living. But when it comes to distress and problems, they usually refer to the ancient wisdom for the solution. This is probably why some of the westerners are caught off guard with the Chinese reactions. There are no lack of heroes and generous donors during disasters. It is one of very few countries where the soldiers carry spades and rescue kits in the disasters instead of riffles to deter looters. On the other hand, one has to be very prudent with strangers on the street. Many foreigners have been cheated by them. Henceforth the good and bad experiences that the foreigners have encountered are just various aspects of life in China.

Looking at the hindsight, is not this situation similar in almost every countries? There are always the good, bad and ugly in every race and society. The Chinese is just like everybody staying next door and colleagues you either love or hate in the office.

Similarly, regions and ancient philosophies are also intertwined that they are far from the originals. Buddhism, Confucianism and Taoism are three most widely accepted religion and practices in China for thousands of years. You can find Taoist deities in the Buddhist temple and vice versa. Zen is often practiced by Buddhist and Taoist. Current Confucian teaching had been mixed with Taoist thoughts which in turned were borrowed from some ancient philosophies and suppositions. Most Chinese live by the principles and practices from these three teachings. Even the Muslim and Chinese Christians observed some of the Chinese rites. Foreigners are not familiar with these Confucianism, Taoism and some ancient teachings and thus they easily misunderstand the Chinese and the culture.

China has a facet in every angle. One has to be discreet when writing about the course of events in China or anticipating her moves. There are many self-opposing conditions, practices and thoughts which the western world is not familiar with. The Chinese has mastered the art of balancing the “Yin” and “Yan” and survival skills from thousands of years in war and conflict.

Welcome to China!

 

Aug 14 2010

 
Print

Difference in upbringing between China and America

Not so long ago, I had read from newspapers how teenagers were treated by their parents in the East and West.

Just last month, many parents in China were almost hysterical when their child sat for the college entrance examination. They would put up at hotels next to the school so that they would not be late by the morning traffic. Reported incidents were common on rifts between motorists and parents who self-volunteered as traffic warden to stop cars from coming near school to prevent noise getting into the examination hall. Many parents would take leave from work to stay at home to coach the children and accompanying them to school. June is the most stressful month for parents with children taking “Gaokao” which is the college entrance examination.

In the West, parents do concern very much about their off-spring performance in school. They would work very hard to save enough money to see their children to have the highest education possible. However they would not act in a very protective manner like the Chinese.

Some parents even encourage their child to take up very dangerous endeavor. Young teenage girls from US, Australia and Netherland had their parent consent and encouragement to make solo sail around the globe. There is an America teenage boy attempting to be the youngest person to scale Mount Everest. He had already successfully reached many of the top peaks in the world. His parents are in full support for his courageous attempt.

Such support from parents to fulfill the dreams of their off-springs in these dangerous feats is unimaginable by the Chinese parents. My mom told me that I would always be her boy as long as I am a bachelor. I remembered how my mom told me not to go near water, road, etc for my own good when I was a child. I have seen this attitude very common in China after living here.

I see the subtle difference in upbringing between America and China. In China, the parents attempt to provide everything to the child and are very protective; while in America, the child is given more freedom to develop on his or her own. The Chinese businessmen would like the son to take over the business while the young American has the option to choose otherwise. Bill Gates does not leave all his fortune to his children. The paternal culture in China is analogous to giving fishes to the fisherman while American parent teach the son to fish.

This is a much generalized statement. I have seen some Chinese parents allowing their sons and daughters to strike out on their own while some Western parents are as protective as the Chinese parents. I am comparing the general trends that I have seen in both countries.

Another observation is how school conducts its education. In China the parent would fault the school if it does not provide sufficient homework. The Chinese education is to read more books, do more homework, remember more data and figures and score more points in examinations.

The America education, on the other hand, put less emphasis on final examination results and wanting the student to develop his or her ability. From primary schools to colleges, American students would stand in front of the class to relate their experience and insights while the Chinese students would take whatever the teachers say. Just sit there and listen. I guess that is the reason why you find the American articulating very confidently in public speeches or business presentation. If you attend a seminar dominated with Chinese audience, you will find very few raising questions. They are just not comfortable to stand up to speak.

When a Chinese has a tragedy and become paralyzed, he would expect his family members to take care of him. Many Americans having the same ill fate do not want to be treated as a handicapped person. They want to be independent and some of them have even tried to perform feats such as running hundreds of miles, swimming across the channel, scaling some heights, etc. Their perseverance and zeal are admirable.

And when it comes to mass mobilization, the Chinese outdo everyone. The precision display in its 2008 Olympics Opening performance demonstrated to the world on its militarized discipline of the soldiers and students. Few countries could match her achievement in such large scale performance.

The Chinese way of disciplining the young to follow orders and acceptance of filial piety as one own responsibility has helped to develop a harmonized society. The Confucius ideology is deep rooted in Chinese culture and has transpired the Chinese to be humble, righteous, polite and filial. The Chinese emphasizes on society (country) over self has produced many heroes and heroines against the enemy and natural disasters since ancient time. The numerous heroic acts and generosity shown two years ago in Sichuan earthquake is a classic Chinese behavior. This could not have happened without the unique Chinese upbringing.

Take a look at the park. The expatriates would leave their children to explore while watching from a distance. The Chinese parents would stick close to the children and offer every hand to help the children to climb.

Interesting result arises from this difference. The adult Chinese could easily have their parents to stay with them even after marriage. It is common to find three generations living together under one roof. While in the US you will find the child move out and stay on his own even if he is single. The American wants to be seen that he is now independent. There is no lack of love between the parents and off-springs in both countries. It is just a matter of upbringing.

I am not criticizing the Chinese way of upbringing nor adoring the American way. The Chinese has produced many talented scientists and engineers while the US has her problems on the rampant juvenile delinquency. There are merits and shortcomings in both systems and environments. We should learn from each other the good and discard the bad. There is something we can adopt in between from the Chinese to manage the masses and the American way of promoting individualism.

Jul 5 2010

 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »


Page 1 of 7